1. A Valid Syllogism:
-Major Premise: All Purdue students are college students.
-Minor Premise: Natalie is a Purdue student.
-Conclusion: Natalie is a college student.
2. An Invalid Syllogism:
-Major Premise: Some hockey players are from Canada.
-Minor Premise: John is a hockey player.
-Conclusion: John is from Canada.
2. A Syllogism Embedded in an Argument:
There are some fruits that are poisonous. An orange is a fruit, so you will get sick if you eat an orange.
Implied:
-Major Premise: Some fruits are poisonous.
-Minor Premise: An orange is a fruit.
-Conclusion: Oranges are poisonous.
This is an invalid syllogism because only some fruits are poisonous. We cannot conclude that oranges are poisonous, we can only conclude that they are fruits.
No comments:
Post a Comment